Brussels II Regulation (EC) No /, also called Brussels IIA or II bis is a European Union Regulation on conflict of law issues in family law between. Praktyczny przewodnik dotyczący stosowania rozporządzenia Bruksela II bis. Front Cover. Publications Office, – 93 pages. The Brussels II Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No / 0f 27 November (Brussels II Regulation ). concerning jurisdiction and the.
|Published (Last):||14 July 2008|
|PDF File Size:||2.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Use the Advanced search.
Where the judgment was given in default of appearance, the person defaulting was served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with an equivalent document in sufficient brukse,a and in such a way as to enable that person to arrange for his or her defence, or the bruksella has been served with the document but not in compliance with these conditions, it is nevertheless established that he or she accepted the decision unequivocally.
The results, where all people who gave their address, were able to join should be published in a few months.
Bruksela I bis – Wardyński & Partners
The regulation does not apply to Denmark. Member State of origin 2.
Where applicable, details of measures taken by courts or authorities to ensure the protection of the child after its return to the Member State of habitual residence Names of parties to whom legal aid has been granted Done at.
Name of Court 5. OJ L Date and place of birth where available 5. Tell us what you think about the summaries!
Bruksela I bis
However, no declaration is required for judgments granting rights of access or concerning the return of a child that have been certified by the original judge in accordance with the Regulation.
Practical arrangements for exercise of rights of access to the extent stated in the judgment Date and place of birth where available.
Date of legal effect in the Brukksela State where the judgment was given 8. A single legal instrument to help international couples resolve disputes, involving more than one country, over their divorce and the custody of their children. The judgment entails the return of the children bruksepa the court has taken into account in issuing its judgment the reasons for and evidence underlying the decision issued pursuant to Article 13 of the Hague Convention of 25 October on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
This possibility is foreseen in Article 40 2. Publications In principle newtech. Date and place of birth where available 4. Place of marriage where available 3.
Practical arrangements for exercise of rights of access to the extent stated in the judgment. Date of birth 3. Intellectual property protection on the alcoholic beverages market EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law.
Retrieved from ” https: Holders of parental responsibility [2 This item is optional. Date of marriage 4. Respondent where available 5.
Full name and date of birth 9. Court which delivered the judgment 4. Place of Court 6.